[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua Cookbook
- From: Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@...>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 20:07:46 -0500
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org> wrote:
> Sure, so the point is that while endless bikeshedding about the license
> is bad, _some_ thought about licensing is good.
let's hope that all this dies soon; but i'll add my 2cents to the noise:
>> So not to spawn this discussion again, has anybody any strong
>> objections against the cookbook being in CC-BY 3.0? This allows most
>> easy use of the book for everything for every purpose.
>
> While nobody's suggesting making this cookbook use the GPL, I think GPL
> _incompatibility_ is unacceptable.
what about:
- code is in MIT (it's most used license in the Lua community)
- articles (and whole book) is in CC-BY.
easy enough? (no new licenses)
complete enough? nobody wants to see the book copied without
attribution, but nobody wan't to add 10-20 different credits to a
program that uses well-known idioms.
--
Javier
- References:
- Re: Lua Cookbook, Marc Balmer
- Re: Lua Cookbook, Luiz Henrique de Figueiredo
- Re: Lua Cookbook, KHMan
- Re: Lua Cookbook, Tony Finch
- Re: Lua Cookbook, KHMan
- Re: Lua Cookbook, Tony Finch
- Re: Lua Cookbook, KHMan
- Re: Lua Cookbook, Tony Finch
- Re: Lua Cookbook, KHMan
- Re: Lua Cookbook, Marc Balmer
- Re: Lua Cookbook, Sean Conner
- Re: Lua Cookbook, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Lua Cookbook, Miles Bader