[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: LuaJIT performance
- From: Tony Finch <dot@...>
- Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 14:10:16 +0100
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Mark Hamburg wrote:
> On Aug 10, 2009, at 11:58 AM, Tony Finch wrote:
> >
> > What tracing JITs are there other than TraceMonkey and LuaJIT2?
>
> TraceMonkey is the poster child for tracing JITs at this point, I think, and
> V8 is generally reported to be faster. I don't know what the status is on
> Tamarind Tracing.
Oh yes, I forgot about Tamarin which (IIRC) was an ancestor of
TraceMonkey developed by Adobe for ActionScript.
AFAIK V8 isn't a trace JIT: it has a Self-style backend.
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS.
MODERATE OR GOOD.
- References:
- LuaJIT performance, John C. Turnbull
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Mike Pall
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Alex Davies
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Michael Bauroth
- Re: LuaJIT performance, RJP Computing
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Asko Kauppi
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Mike Pall
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Mike Pall
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Mark Hamburg
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Tony Finch
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Mark Hamburg