[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: LuaJIT performance
- From: Tony Finch <dot@...>
- Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:58:01 +0100
On Mon, 10 Aug 2009, Mark Hamburg wrote:
>
> It will be interesting to see your results. I've talked to people doing
> dynamic language implementations who've observed that the tracing JITs haven't
> been faring as well as their initial hype suggested particularly in the
> JavaScript world.
What tracing JITs are there other than TraceMonkey and LuaJIT2?
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
GERMAN BIGHT HUMBER: SOUTHWEST 5 TO 7. MODERATE OR ROUGH. SQUALLY SHOWERS.
MODERATE OR GOOD.
- References:
- LuaJIT performance, John C. Turnbull
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Mike Pall
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Alex Davies
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Michael Bauroth
- Re: LuaJIT performance, RJP Computing
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Asko Kauppi
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Mike Pall
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Mike Pall
- Re: LuaJIT performance, Mark Hamburg