[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: nanomsg binding?
- From: Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@...>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:10:14 -0600
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Petr Štetiar <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Justin Cormack <email@example.com> [2013-11-11 18:52:24]:
>> BTW, its not a complete solution but I have been fixing luaffi
>> https://github.com/jmckaskill/luaffi recently. I am thinking of using it as
>> a struct library but still with C API function calls (as thats the non
>> portable bit).
> Oh, nice to see Windows CE there! Now just Linux ARM/MIPS support and I'm
> all-in :-)
> No, I'm kidding. I can't help myself but FFI adds just another layer to the
> solution. And I tend to see each layer as a potential source of troubles.
> Maybe, that it's just because I'm little bit conservative.
> Anyway, nice work!
> -- ynezz
Feel free to check out my Work In Progress. I'll announce it when
documentation is done and I'm finished with the GC process. Other than
that, it works great.
Also, I would appreciate any and all advice on doing things better.
It's my first real C project, so it's rough.