[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: nanomsg binding?
- From: Justin Cormack <justin@...>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:52:24 +0000
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Petr Štetiar <email@example.com> wrote:
> Pierre Chapuis <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2013-11-11 16:05:54]:
>> Regarding nanomsg, I had written a binding for LuaJIT in its early
>> days and found out somebody else had as well. So we merged and the
>> binding is now under the official nanomsg project on GitHub:
> I would use it, but FFI...
BTW, its not a complete solution but I have been fixing luaffi
https://github.com/jmckaskill/luaffi recently. I am thinking of using
it as a struct library but still with C API function calls (as thats
the non portable bit).