[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: nanomsg binding?
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:27:07 +0200
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Andrew Starks <email@example.com> wrote:
> documentation. My plan is to release it, as well. It sounds like there
> will be 4 nanomsg libraries! (I'm calling mine nml for, "NanoMsg for
Wheel reinvention continues, although heaven knows I'm cool with more & merrier.
If you document it well, then it could become much more attractive.
Otherwise finding a Lua module is like looking for parts in a junk
Remember that many 5.1 bindings are straightforward to convert to 5.2
bindings with a few #ifdefs and a higher-level style.
Short para for the uninitiated: what is NanoMsg and what is its claim to fame?