[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: nanomsg binding?
- From: Petr Štetiar <ynezz@...>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:05:19 +0100
Justin Cormack <firstname.lastname@example.org> [2013-11-11 18:52:24]:
> BTW, its not a complete solution but I have been fixing luaffi
> https://github.com/jmckaskill/luaffi recently. I am thinking of using it as
> a struct library but still with C API function calls (as thats the non
> portable bit).
Oh, nice to see Windows CE there! Now just Linux ARM/MIPS support and I'm
No, I'm kidding. I can't help myself but FFI adds just another layer to the
solution. And I tend to see each layer as a potential source of troubles.
Maybe, that it's just because I'm little bit conservative.
Anyway, nice work!