[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: nanomsg binding?
- From: "Pierre Chapuis" <catwell@...>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:05:54 +0100
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Andrew Starks <email@example.com>
> Wheel reinvention continues, although heaven knows I'm cool with more &
Currently thinking about what exactly I will say at the Workshop,
and this topic in particular. I think it's a bit sad to see such
I can understand that different bindings can have different goals,
but at least we should try to agree on a reasonable interface and
make them interchangeable.
Regarding nanomsg, I had written a binding for LuaJIT in its early
days and found out somebody else had as well. So we merged and the
binding is now under the official nanomsg project on GitHub:
I really don't think a library still very unstable should have that