[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax
- From: steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@...>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 12:00:05 +0200
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Mike Pall <mikelu-1106@mike.de> wrote:
> [All this idle and completely pointless talk about syntax here --
> it's shocking to see how much this mailing list has deteriorated.
> It's embarrassing that I have to respond in this thread at all.]
Indeed, I really don't see any problem with the current proposal. The
label syntax is sufficiently distinct that it can be made to stand out
in source, and it serves its need.
It does feel like bike-shedding. There are so many more important
things to discuss about this new revision of the language.
steve d.
- References:
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Alexandre Erwin Ittner
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Frank Meier-Dörnberg
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Kastrup
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Frank Meier-Dörnberg
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Eduardo Ochs
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Frank Meier-Dörnberg
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, David Given
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) now available, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, Edgar Toernig
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, David Manura
- Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (beta-rc1) goto syntax, Mike Pall