Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching

[Leo Razoumov <slonik.az@...>]

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 07:10, T T <t34www@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I did mention that it cost you an arm and both legs ;)  That's one of
> the reasons I'm looking now at Python as a replacement for it.
>

I would think LuaJIT2+FFI would be a better choice but, unfortunately,
SciPy is further down the road and attracts more attention.

--Leo--