[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching
- From: T T <t34www@...>
- Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 11:14:12 +0000
On 16 February 2011 08:47, Francesco Abbate <francesco.bbt@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm working now to implement the system to control the error and
> adjust the step of automatically. This is something required in real
> cases where a fixed step size would be a too much coarse approach.
If you are serious about writing RK (explicit) ODE integrator with
auto time step control, then the Dormand–Prince method with embedded
RK 4/5 pair is the one to go for:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dormand–Prince_method
See also:
"A survey of the MATLAB ODE suite"
http://www.osaka-kyoiku.ac.jp/~ashino/pdf/2651.pdf
Double time step error control is not exactly the state-of-the-art any more.
Cheers,
Tomek
- References:
- LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Mike Pall
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Mike Pall
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Florian Weimer
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Leo Razoumov
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Leo Razoumov
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Leo Razoumov
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate