Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching

[Francesco Abbate <francesco.bbt@...>]

2011/2/17 T T <t34www@googlemail.com>:
> You do realize that you succeeded only in testing MATLAB's interpreter
> and not jit, don't you?!? MATLAB doesn't jit scripts.  Slap a
> 'function foo()' at the top and watch it run almost 80 times faster.
> For N=1e8 I get 0.91sec with MATLAB and 0.68sec with LuaJIT-2.  Pretty
> close I would say.

It seems that you know pretty well MATLAB. I was wondering what are
its performances for ODE integration with a user supplied function. Do
you know what kind of performances it can delivers in this case ?


-- 
Francesco