Re: Internationalization of Lua

[mathieu stumpf guntz <psychoslave@...>]

Le 22/11/2016 à 08:26, mathieu stumpf guntz a écrit :
> Le 22/11/2016 à 06:25, Dirk Laurie a écrit :
> > But (finally returning to the topic of the thread) the fact that APL
> > and Lua for all practical purposes inhabit different lexical worlds
> > makes it possible to write a single interpreter that mixes APL and
> > Lua at use input level. I'd hate to give that up. Si I guess that I 
> > don't
> > want internationalization in standard Lua. Call it Lua-i18n as the
> > OP said, but please keep that i18n in the name at all levels. Don't
> > call it Lua.
> For the part which enable to use other lexems than the default reserve 
> ones, the idea is to make that only through a loadable scope contained 
> feature.
I meant: For the part which enable the use of other lexems than the 
default reserved ones, the idea is to make that only through a loadable 
scope contained feature. Please feel free to correct me or give me 
feedback on English mistakes in my message off list.