And since it fits within the same vicinity as your observation,
Roberto wrote:
> Not at all. We just reason in the world of reasoning ;-)
I was going to reply with something about how two people may value different things and then reasoning might lead you to a different answer. I think that you probably hold the view that a design that is as simple as possible is always easier to explain and therefore use, than one that accommodates large, semi-overlapping groups of shared expectations.
So, now I won't argue that.
-Andrew