Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching

[Leo Razoumov <slonik.az@...>]

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 05:45, T T <t34www@googlemail.com> wrote:
> And not to be nasty but you posted the same exact benchmark in the
> past saying (emphasis mine) [1]:
>
>  "It seems that MATLAB Windows port is better optimized but it is still
>  about 100 times slower than LuaJIT-1. The joke is that MATLAB has its
>  own JIT since version 6.5 and JIT *was enabled* for these tests."
>
> [1] http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2009-11/msg00357.html
>
> So I wasn't exactly sure how much you know about jit in MATLAB.
>
> Cheers,
> Tomek

In 2009 I  did not know the details of MATLAB JIT (it is not my main
line of work anyway).
You know people can learn things in the following 14 months, don't you think?
And ,yes, you are being nasty!

--Leo--