[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching
- From: Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@...>
- Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 11:54:32 -0500
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:26 AM, T T <t34www@googlemail.com> wrote:
>> IMHO, the best thing that could happen to MATLAB is to switch to Lua,
>> license Mike's LuaJIT and port their cool toolboxes to it.
>
> Dream on. That will never happen. But one could write a bridge to
> MATLAB, something like lupa for python. With access to native data
> types in MATLAB through FFI, that could be quite fast.
another thing that could happen is to write a mathematic suite on Lua.
--
Javier
- References:
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Florian Weimer
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Leo Razoumov
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Leo Razoumov
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Leo Razoumov
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Francesco Abbate
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, T T
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Daurnimator
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Mike Pall
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Philippe Lhoste
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Alexander Gladysh
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Miles Bader
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, T T
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, steve donovan
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, T T
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, Leo Razoumov
- Re: LuaJIT2 performance for number crunching, T T