[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: OOBit
- From: Nilson <nilson.brazil@...>
- Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:59:10 -0300
Oi Roberto,
Like I always said, I am a newbie here, so I apologize for any
"bother" or inconvenience. I thought I was only clarifying
misunderstood concepts about the patch. Maybe the enthusiasm of a
newbie thinking he found something really useful (well, I still
thinking). No problem.
No more OOBit posts (again) until the beta announcement.
.
I would appreciate some help in benchmarking on different platforms
and Lua's stack handling (again).
By the way: The original post about OOBit follows below.
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Roberto Ierusalimschy
<roberto@inf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
> That is not true. The original post started like this:
>
> Could you send me opinions about OOBIT patch? I would appreciate any
> opinion that could help me to decide the patch's future.
>
Hi everyone,
I'm thinking about a Lua patch and before spend much time working on
it, I would appreciate any comments about *** the ideas involved. ****
Thanks in advance for your attention.
--
Nilson
- References:
- Re: OOBit, Peter Sommerfeld
- Re: OOBit, Christopher Eykamp
- Re: OOBit, Peter Sommerfeld
- Re: OOBit, Tim Mensch
- Re: OOBit, Javier Guerra Giraldez
- Re: OOBit, Tim Mensch
- Re: OOBit, Nilson
- Re: OOBit, Sean Conner
- Re: OOBit, Tim Mensch
- Re: OOBit, Christopher Eykamp
- Re: OOBit, Roberto Ierusalimschy