Re: Ternary operator patch

[Pierre Chapuis <catwell@...>]

On Sun, 12 Sep 2010 22:16:10 +1000, Eric Man <usyd.meric@gmail.com>
wrote:
> How about just change the existing if-then-else-end to become a 
> ternary operator?
> 
> local successful = if result==1 then void_func1(); bool_func2()
> eiseif  result==2 then do_this(); false; else bool_func3() end
> 
> It returns the last thing in the block, just like lisp's "cond".
> 
> Big change, but IMO more elegant.

Apparently nobody has it yet, I find it strange. Why not the classical:

a = b ? x : y

-- 
Pierre Chapuis