[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Ternary operator patch
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 18:01:28 -0300
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 2:42 AM, David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org> wrote:
> > Do you really think you can keep children from growing up?
>
> Can you be less cryptic please, and explain what you think the
> long-term issues are? I think this is a useful addition too.
I have an issue, but I am not sure it is a "long-term" one. I think
the proposed syntax, without "end", will be quite confusing to some
people, given that the almost identical if command must have "end".
On the other hand, a syntax with "end" is cumbersome.
-- Roberto
- References:
- Re: Ternary operator patch, steve donovan
- Re: Ternary operator patch, Henk Boom
- Re: Ternary operator patch, steve donovan
- Re: Ternary operator patch, Geoff Leyland
- Re: Ternary operator patch, steve donovan
- Re: Ternary operator patch, Miles Bader
- Re: Ternary operator patch, David Kastrup
- Re: Ternary operator patch, Miles Bader
- Re: Ternary operator patch, David Kastrup
- Re: Ternary operator patch, Jonathan Castello