[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn
- From: Boyko Bantchev <boykobb@...>
- Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:30:21 +0200
On 1/26/06, Michael T. Richter <ttmrichter@gmail.com> wrote:
> For a comment that exactly explains why I won't be using K ever....
Well, K seems to have already accumulated some users, or at least
customers :) Look at their customer list at http://kx.com .
> In its favour is brevity. K programs are astonishingly small.
They are strikingly fast as well. Consult these:
http://www.kx.com/a/k/examples/bell.k
http://nsl.com/papers/phone.htm
http://nsl.com/papers/addagram.htm
- References:
- Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Vijay Aswadhati
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Walter Cruz
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Ben Sunshine-Hill
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, mnewberry
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Chris Marrin
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Lisa Parratt
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Michael T. Richter
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Lisa Parratt
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Michael Abbott
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Michael T. Richter
