Sean:
On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:11 PM, Sean Conner <
sean@conman.org> wrote:
It was thus said that the Great Francisco Olarte once stated:
...
Interesting. Who owns & which permissions does /usr have in those? (
...
[spc]saltmine-2:/usr>ll
mmm, that "ll" seems to be used a lot in Mac. Is it an alias to "ls
-l" ? If so, for this kind of things "ls -la" is sometimes better ( as
it includes the permisisons for /usr in . )
...
-spc (So I own '/usr/local' ... hmm ... )
Yep, that you told before. I wanted to see which usr/group owns /usr
and wich permissions it had. Anyway, seen the scary stuff npm has
pulled around this week with the permissions, and the recomendations
to chmod/own things in /usr I'm not too surprised to see that kid of
stuff.
I, personally, haven't touched the default permissions, everything
owned by root in /usr /etc /bin /sbin for a couple decades, I've just
get used to install things locally ( in ~ ), but maybe bsd || mac has
different layout/conventions.
Francisco Olarte.
