[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Installing Lua on macOS in order to update Lua.
- From: Glenn Travis <travplays@...>
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2018 17:36:25 -0600
Well for me I have the following:
alias la="ls -aFG"
alias ll="ls -lS"
> On Feb 25, 2018, at 12:06 PM, Francisco Olarte <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 24, 2018 at 11:11 PM, Sean Conner <email@example.com> wrote:
>> It was thus said that the Great Francisco Olarte once stated:
>>> Interesting. Who owns & which permissions does /usr have in those? (
> mmm, that "ll" seems to be used a lot in Mac. Is it an alias to "ls
> -l" ? If so, for this kind of things "ls -la" is sometimes better ( as
> it includes the permisisons for /usr in . )
>> -spc (So I own '/usr/local' ... hmm ... )
> Yep, that you told before. I wanted to see which usr/group owns /usr
> and wich permissions it had. Anyway, seen the scary stuff npm has
> pulled around this week with the permissions, and the recomendations
> to chmod/own things in /usr I'm not too surprised to see that kid of
> I, personally, haven't touched the default permissions, everything
> owned by root in /usr /etc /bin /sbin for a couple decades, I've just
> get used to install things locally ( in ~ ), but maybe bsd || mac has
> different layout/conventions.
> Francisco Olarte.