Re: LuaCoCo+Lua 5.3.x

[Eduardo Tongson <propolice@...>]

On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Michal Kottman
<michal.kottman@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 14 October 2016 at 11:42, Bizins'kyi Yurii <jarni.ua@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> But, to not be stucked with one library I took Boris's advice and just
>>> used plain Lua 5.1 with LuaCoCo. It compiles - good sign. Later on we will
>>> see I we'll have to go back to LuaJIT and try to integrate LuaCoCo to 2.0.x
>
>
> Based on this post [1] by Mike Pall (author of LuaJIT), "there's little need
> for CoCo anymore" in LuaJIT 2. That said, I have no experience with CoCo and
> LuaJIT 2.
>
> [1] http://www.freelists.org/post/luajit/CoCo-in-202,1

According to LuaJIT docs, the LuaJIT VM is fully resumable. I guess
the Coco features were integrated around the introduction of LuaJIT 2.
A viable solution might be patching Lua 5.1.5 with LuaCoco and/or use
LuaJIT 2.

Slightly OT, I'm curious about the OP's configuration. "Lua 5.1
(alpha) + LuaJIT 1.0.3.": how does that work? Mixed PUC Lua and LuaJIT
code base?

Cheers!