Re: LuaCoCo+Lua 5.3.x

[Michal Kottman <michal.kottman@...>]

On 14 October 2016 at 11:42, Bizins'kyi Yurii <jarni.ua@gmail.com> wrote:

But, to not be stucked with one library I took Boris's advice and just used plain Lua 5.1 with LuaCoCo. It compiles - good sign. Later on we will see I we'll have to go back to LuaJIT and try to integrate LuaCoCo to 2.0.x

Based on this post [1] by Mike Pall (author of LuaJIT), "there's little need for CoCo anymore" in LuaJIT 2. That said, I have no experience with CoCo and LuaJIT 2.

[1] http://www.freelists.org/post/luajit/CoCo-in-202,1