[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables)
- From: Peter Aronoff <telemachus@...>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 15:09:59 -0400
Philipp Janda <siffiejoe@gmx.net> wrote:
> Am I the only one who has re-implemented something like C++ strings in
> C for storing binary data or for building strings piecemeal?
No, I’ve done it as well, and there are countless C string libraries for
this purpose. I wasn’t going to argue with Roberto, but I’m glad you said
something.
P
--
We have not been faced with the need to satisfy someone else's
requirements, and for this freedom we are grateful.
Dennis Ritchie and Ken Thompson, The UNIX Time-Sharing System
- References:
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Soni L.
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Tim Hill
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Coda Highland
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Tim Hill
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Soni L.
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Peter Aronoff
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Soni L.
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Peter Aronoff
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Philipp Janda