[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables)
- From: Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@...>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 14:11:35 -0300
> Thanks for your detailed reply here. I had in mind general complaints about
> how difficult C strings have turned out to be in terms of use and security,
> but I take your point that they do several things well—especially if we’re
> concerned with efficiency. [...]
It is very easy to find several flaws in C strings, until you consider
all the alternatives.
-- Roberto
- References:
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Soni L.
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Tim Hill
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Soni L.
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Tim Hill
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Coda Highland
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Tim Hill
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Soni L.
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Peter Aronoff
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Soni L.
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Peter Aronoff