[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables)
- From: Coda Highland <chighland@...>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 11:49:58 -0700
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:22 AM, Javier Guerra Giraldez
<javier@guerrag.com> wrote:
> On 7 July 2016 at 19:20, Roberto Ierusalimschy <roberto@inf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
>> At least the implementation still guarantees that; it is only a
>> documentation matter...
>
>
> BTW, why was that guarantee removed?
Probably to allow __len to override it.
/s/ Adam
- References:
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), steve donovan
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), steve donovan
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Soni L.
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Tim Hill
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Soni L.
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Tim Hill
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Coda Highland
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), steve donovan
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Joseph Manning
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Dirk Laurie
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: New array type? (was: 'table' as fallback for tables), Javier Guerra Giraldez
