[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Speed of Lua's immutable strings vs buffers (split from Re: Pooling of strings is good)
- From: Coroutines <coroutines@...>
- Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 08:15:29 -0700
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:35 PM, Axel Kittenberger <axkibe@gmail.com> wrote:
> Back the days where the list was heavily loaded with arguments about
> #-operator and broken sequences ("arrays with holes") a rule was concluded:
> if you make a suggestion and expect the core team to take their time with
> it, take your time and provide a patch with your suggestion.
My suggestion was not something I could do myself. I wanted an
interface provided by upstream to have userdata look like strings
where lua_isstring() or similar are used. Quick, lemme go figure out
an anti-gravity device because that's what I'm suggesting now --
should be done by mid-afternoon.
- References:
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Sean Conner
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Philipp Janda
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Philipp Janda
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Speed of Lua's immutable strings vs buffers (split from Re: Pooling of strings is good), Sean Conner
- Re: Speed of Lua's immutable strings vs buffers (split from Re: Pooling of strings is good), Coroutines
- Re: Speed of Lua's immutable strings vs buffers (split from Re: Pooling of strings is good), Axel Kittenberger