[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Pooling of strings is good
- From: Coroutines <coroutines@...>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:29:53 -0700
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 1:14 PM, Roberto Ierusalimschy
<roberto@inf.puc-rio.br> wrote:
>> Earlier in this long and unproductive email chain [...]
>
> On which you created more than 40% of the messages...
Good, so you understand my disappointment -- having repeatedly
clarified what I'm looking to do for those who didn't read. Now that
everybody is caught up we can start being productive ^__^
- References:
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Jay Carlson
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Sean Conner
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Philipp Janda
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Philipp Janda
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Roberto Ierusalimschy
