[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Pooling of strings is good
- From: Coroutines <coroutines@...>
- Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 11:26:19 -0700
On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 11:22 AM, Axel Kittenberger <axkibe@gmail.com> wrote:
> So code duplication is bad? Never look at code duplication? You aren't
> making one of these generalisations here you are hating so much?
Earlier in this long and unproductive email chain I was purporting
that ideas/projects talked about on this list are killed by dangerous
generalizations.
I've come to the better conclusion that some people just want to
argue. Indefinitely...
- References:
- Pooling of strings is good, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Dirk Laurie
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Jay Carlson
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Jay Carlson
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Sean Conner
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Philipp Janda
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Philipp Janda
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Coroutines
- Re: Pooling of strings is good, Axel Kittenberger