[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Proposals that didn't work (was Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers)
- From: Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@...>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 16:09:46 -0500
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 2:35 PM, Petite Abeille
<petite.abeille@gmail.com> wrote:
> When the solution is the problem
> How to prevent over-engineering & useless features in software
> https://medium.com/p/50adb9f6caf9
Second awesome link of the day. Thank you for this!
--Andrew
- References:
- Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Tony Papadimitriou
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, steve donovan
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Andrew Starks
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Andrew Starks
- Proposals that didn't work (was Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers), Sean Conner
- Re: Proposals that didn't work (was Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers), Petite Abeille
