[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- From: Coroutines <coroutines@...>
- Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2014 06:59:34 -0700
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 6:07 AM, Andrew Starks <andrew.starks@trms.com> wrote:
> With that data in hand, evaluating this proposal will be enjoyable!
What data would you accept? I think this is a much different proposal
from something people can sample as a module. Asking others to
recompile Lua just to try out my changes to identifier naming seems
unreasonable to me -- most of my friends just use what's packaged by
their Linux distro of choice. I'm not sure many would have the nerve
to patch Lua ~
I think it's a fairly straightforward proposal, I was mostly looking
for immediate reasons I might have overlooked for "why not".
Originally I wanted all punctuation in identifiers (after the first
character) -- but then I remembered that an operator could follow too
closely and confuse this.
- References:
- Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Tony Papadimitriou
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Coroutines
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, steve donovan
- Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers, Andrew Starks
- Prev by Date:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Next by Date:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Previous by thread:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Next by thread:
Re: Proposal: allow @, $, !, and ? in Lua identifiers
- Index(es):