[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua Ecosystem
- From: "Pierre Chapuis" <catwell@...>
- Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 16:38:30 +0100
> 2013/11/26 Pierre Chapuis <catwell@archlinux.us>:
>
>> You can atually require parts of LuaRocks in your program
>> if you want, I do it in Lua Toolbox [1].
>
> I can see these:
>
> â?¦/luarocks$ ls
> add.lua fetch.lua manif_core.lua search.lua
> admin_remove.lua fs manif.lua show.lua
> build fs.lua new_version.lua site_config.lua
> build.lua help.lua pack.lua tools
> cache.lua index.lua path.lua type_check.lua
> cfg.lua install.lua persist.lua unpack.lua
> command_line.lua lint.lua purge.lua util.lua
> deps.lua list.lua refresh_cache.lua validate.lua
> dir.lua loader.lua remove.lua
> download.lua make.lua repos.lua
> fetch make_manifest.lua require.lua
>
> There is no official documentation. That to my mind means
> that the maintainer does not promise anything about what
> the modules do: everything is "implementation detail".
The documentation is at http://luarocks.luaforge.net/luadoc/
That being said I agree that a small subset of it could
be guaranteed "stable" if people are to use it in their
code.