[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: file:read("*n") reference manual entry improvement
- From: Paige DePol <lual@...>
- Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2013 08:01:28 -0500
Yes, I do agree, it would probably become a spam magnet, which is why such
a system would need some dedicated people willing to do a lot of work with
little direct reward, other than helping future generations of Lua hackers! :)
I am using Xcode under OSX and it does a very nice job with syntax coloring,
but obviously it also has no annotation features.
~pmd~
On Oct 25, 2013, at 7:50 AM, steve donovan <steve.j.donovan@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Paige DePol <lual@serfnet.org> wrote:
>> however, the official site is just showing the standard source without any
>> extra annotations apart from the source comments... unless I am missing something?
>
> Missing nothing - the official site has much better styling, but does
> not support annotations. Building a system that allows people with
> appropriate authorization to add stuff would be tricky - otherwise it
> would get full of spam.
>
> One option is to keep a Lua 5.2.2 version on github and use their
> annotation/comment facility.
>
- References:
- Re: file:read("*n") reference manual entry improvement, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: file:read("*n") reference manual entry improvement, Lorenzo Donati
- Re: file:read("*n") reference manual entry improvement, Roberto Ierusalimschy
- Re: file:read("*n") reference manual entry improvement, Paul Merrell
- Re: file:read("*n") reference manual entry improvement, Justin Cormack
- Re: file:read("*n") reference manual entry improvement, Paul Merrell
- Re: file:read("*n") reference manual entry improvement, Paige DePol
- Re: file:read("*n") reference manual entry improvement, steve donovan
- Re: file:read("*n") reference manual entry improvement, Paige DePol
- Re: file:read("*n") reference manual entry improvement, steve donovan