Re: [ANN] Brozula - Luajit bytecode VM for JavaScript

[Tang Daogang <daogangtang@...>]

This is a great start! Support!

On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Craig Barnes <craigbarnes85@gmail.com> wrote:

On 6 December 2012 14:22, Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@guerrag.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Tim Caswell <tim@creationix.com> wrote:
> > But since I wanted to use luajit in my web app, I decided to write another
> > VM.
>
> just curious, is the LuaJIT bytecode somewhat easier to interpret?  or
> is the compiler better in some aspect?  because i don't think you'll
> be able to use FFI....  ;-)
>
> --
> Javier
>

To quote Mike Pall: "The LuaJIT bytecode format is portable and ~40%
smaller than Lua bytecode". Also, this:
https://github.com/humbletim/ljs/issues/1

-- 
Nothing is impossible.