[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] Brozula - Luajit bytecode VM for JavaScript
- From: Craig Barnes <craigbarnes85@...>
- Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 14:42:39 +0000
On 6 December 2012 14:22, Javier Guerra Giraldez <javier@guerrag.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 6:20 PM, Tim Caswell <tim@creationix.com> wrote:
> > But since I wanted to use luajit in my web app, I decided to write another
> > VM.
>
> just curious, is the LuaJIT bytecode somewhat easier to interpret? or
> is the compiler better in some aspect? because i don't think you'll
> be able to use FFI.... ;-)
>
> --
> Javier
>
To quote Mike Pall: "The LuaJIT bytecode format is portable and ~40%
smaller than Lua bytecode". Also, this:
https://github.com/humbletim/ljs/issues/1
