Re: Suitability of Lua as a First Programming Language?

[spir <denis.spir@...>]

On 02/12/2012 14:38, Laurent Faillie wrote:
> IMO, BASIC won because it was more versatile still being very easy to learn.

Or LOGO lost because it has self-call recursion built at its core and you can 
hardly ignore it ;-) ? (once you live the turtle alone, I mean, and even then) 
Just too abstract, difficult for introduction to programming?
I met LOGO before Lisp, and, well, it did not help much because I had not 
grasped the concept from LOGO ;-)

Denis