[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Suitability of Lua as a First Programming Language?
- From: spir <denis.spir@...>
- Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2012 12:58:09 +0100
On 02/12/2012 14:38, Laurent Faillie wrote:
IMO, BASIC won because it was more versatile still being very easy to learn.
Or LOGO lost because it has self-call recursion built at its core and you can
hardly ignore it ;-) ? (once you live the turtle alone, I mean, and even then)
Just too abstract, difficult for introduction to programming?
I met LOGO before Lisp, and, well, it did not help much because I had not
grasped the concept from LOGO ;-)