[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Lua-ified Lua users wiki?
- From: Rob Hoelz <rob@...>
- Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2011 23:00:09 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
I agree that "if it's not broken, don't fix it", but I think it'd be kinda nice to "eat our own dog food" as a community, so to speak.
On Sep 23, 2011, at 7:57 PM, Petite Abeille wrote:
>
> On Sep 23, 2011, at 3:20 PM, Stefan Reich wrote:
>
>> like when you
>> propose weird things like using Lua (what is that again? some obscure
>> language?) for a wiki.
>
> No one said it was weird to use Lua to implement a wiki. There are a handful of such beasts around [1].
>
> The question at hand was: would it be worthwhile to migrate the existing, well established, lua-users.org wiki to a Lua powered one. As this is mostly a lateral move (replacing one working implementation with another) this seems to be rather pointless.
>
> This question came up before:
>
> http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2008-01/msg00489.html
> http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2008-02/msg00538.html
> http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2008-02/msg00635.html
> http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2008-02/msg00699.html
> http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2008-02/msg00882.html
>
> etc, etc...
>
> [1] http://lua-users.org/wiki/LibrariesAndBindings
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAk59VckACgkQUoGaR6SGEarf9ACgsrDyJGp3MgdO5jqICPoIzkBv
ql8AoKCjOMz3q2TPVXpovua1h0Kd+r7k
=VOt9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----