[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: Copyright question
- From: Rob Kendrick <rjek@...>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 16:38:05 +0100
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 04:49:43PM +0200, Stefan Reich wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 2:07 AM, David Kastrup <email@example.com> wrote:
> > The GPL takes away choice. But it in a corporate setting, the "choice"
> > that is taken away is often not optional: maximizing shareholder value
> > _requires_ a company _not_ to voluntarily yield anything which could be
> > withheld as a company asset.
> That is why companies make no sense and will soon be relegated to history... :)
They seem to be doing OK at the moment...
> Public domain is the only licensing model that does not cause any problems. :)
Except, as I and others have said, it's not a licensing model.