[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Reasons for a Web Developer to use Lua?
- From: Axel Kittenberger <axkibe@...>
- Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2011 18:13:44 +0100
I wrote C(++) to mean "C or C++" which I wouldn't differ in sake of
the question which was Lua or "something else". Wheres the point was
brought up to use C(++). I objected, that to do either only if its
worth. Not only is C(++) more work to code and debug. Its also more
work to code it with the same level of algorithmic efficiency
(hastables, trees) etc. That is only go for C(++) if the reduced needs
in ressources pays of the costs you safe in cheaper servers. I would
drop the argument here on the lua list, for C vs. C++.
- References:
- Reasons for a Web Developer to use Lua?, Tim Johnson
- Re: Reasons for a Web Developer to use Lua?, Michael Gogins
- Re: Reasons for a Web Developer to use Lua?, Tim Johnson
- Re: Reasons for a Web Developer to use Lua?, Chris Babcock
- Re: Reasons for a Web Developer to use Lua?, Tim Johnson
- Re: Reasons for a Web Developer to use Lua?, Michael Gogins
- Re: Reasons for a Web Developer to use Lua?, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Reasons for a Web Developer to use Lua?, Tim Johnson
- Re: Reasons for a Web Developer to use Lua?, David Favro
- Re: Reasons for a Web Developer to use Lua?, Mark Hamburg