[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Behavior of logical operators
- From: Tony Finch <dot@...>
- Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2011 12:12:22 +0000
On Mon, 14 Mar 2011, Reuben Thomas wrote:
> http://wwwold.dkuug.dk/jtc1/sc22/open/n2794/
That's a bit weird. The document itself says it is WG14/N843 which is a
rather smaller document number. Ah, I see it got given another number
when it was passed up to SC22 as the final committee draft. However I
understood that N869 was closest to the actual standard.
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n869/
However there have been at least three technical corrigenda, so N1256 is a
more useful document since it is C99 + TC1 + TC2 + TC3.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/n1256.pdf
I think all the subsequent committee drafts are working towards the next
edition of the standard. For those who are right up to the minute, the
almost final committee draft of C1X is available in the latest working
group mailing:
http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/sc22/wg14/www/docs/PreLondon-2011.htm
Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
South Fisher, German Bight: Variable 3, becoming easterly 4 or 5. Slight or
moderate. Rain, fog patches. Moderate, occasionally very poor.
- References:
- Behavior of logical operators, Andre Naef
- Re: Behavior of logical operators, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Behavior of logical operators, Javier Guerra Giraldez
- RE: Behavior of logical operators, Andre Naef
- Re: Behavior of logical operators, Eero Pajarre
- Re: Behavior of logical operators, Axel Kittenberger
- Re: Behavior of logical operators, David Kastrup
- Re: Behavior of logical operators, Reuben Thomas
- Re: Behavior of logical operators, Philippe Lhoste
- Re: Behavior of logical operators, Reuben Thomas