[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
- Subject: Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available
- From: GrayFace <sergroj@...>
- Date: Mon, 24 May 2010 08:15:56 +0700
I'd also second that. The reason why ipairs is useful for me is that
it's not the same as numeric for, but rarher it's a while with increment
that continues until it finds nil.
On 20.05.2010 18:02, Alexander Gladysh wrote:
That being said, my strong opinion is that if there would be
deprecated version of ipairs in the 5.2, it must be 5.1 ipairs, not a
new variant. No sense in requiring user's to adapt their code twice.
Sergey Rozhenko mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org