Re: [ANN] Lua 5.2.0 (work3) now available

[GrayFace <sergroj@...>]

I'd also second that. The reason why ipairs is useful for me is that 
it's not the same as numeric for, but rarher it's a while with increment 
that continues until it finds nil.

On 20.05.2010 18:02, Alexander Gladysh wrote:
> That being said, my strong opinion is that if there would be
> deprecated version of ipairs in the 5.2, it must be 5.1 ipairs, not a
> new variant. No sense in requiring user's to adapt their code twice.
>
> Alexander.
>
>
>
>    

--

___________________________________________
Best regards,
Sergey Rozhenko                 mailto:sergroj@mail.ru