Re: Lua on Windows: lua51.dll versus lua5.1.dll

lua-l archive

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Lua on Windows: lua51.dll versus lua5.1.dll
From: Matt Campbell <mattcampbell@...>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 13:12:02 -0500

Stephen Kellett wrote:

    lua5_1.dll

I think the worst solution would be a third naming convention.Considering my repsonse to Gary's concern about LuaInterface, I don'tthink that will be necessary.


Matt

References:
- Lua on Windows: lua51.dll versus lua5.1.dll, Matt Campbell
- RE: Lua on Windows: lua51.dll versus lua5.1.dll, Antonio Scuri
- Re: Lua on Windows: lua51.dll versus lua5.1.dll, Stefan Sandberg
- Re: Lua on Windows: lua51.dll versus lua5.1.dll, Stephen Kellett

Prev by Date: Re: Lua on Windows: lua51.dll versus lua5.1.dll
Next by Date: Re: Lua on Windows: lua51.dll versus lua5.1.dll
Previous by thread: Re: Lua on Windows: lua51.dll versus lua5.1.dll
Next by thread: Re: Lua on Windows: lua51.dll versus lua5.1.dll
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread