Re: Lua on Windows: lua51.dll versus lua5.1.dll

[Matt Campbell <mattcampbell@...>]

I wrote:
> As of version 2.0, LuaInterface doesn't use a standard Lua DLL anyway. 
[snip]

For what it's worth, LuaInterface doesn't have to remain this way.  In 
fact, I suggest that LuaInterface's C++/CLI glue code be moved to its 
own DLL, maybe called LuaGlue.dll.  That DLL could link against a 
standard Lua DLL, such as the one from LuaBinaries; then, the 
LuaInterface package wouldn't even need to include its own build of Lua. 
 I think that would be the best solution to the problem Gary mentioned.

Matt