Re: Lua on Windows: lua51.dll versus lua5.1.dll

[Stephen Kellett <lua@...>]

Stefan Sandberg wrote:
> It -is- however named one or the other with the purpose of being 
> descriptive and put into context as interpreted by a human,
> as opposed to say just a unique ID, so for the sake of clarity, I 
> strongly advocate '5.1', as it's far more descriptive than 'fifty-one'

Given that there are complaints that lua5.1.dll doesn't get on with 
another DLL, why not use a different separator:

	lua5_1.dll

Stephen