[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: CMake and Lua
- From: "Eric Tetz" <erictetz@...>
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:01:49 -0800
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 10:45 PM, Brandon Van Every <bvanevery@gmail.com> wrote:
> You Ain't Gonna Need It is the exact opposite philosophy from
> future proofing. Compare also, Worse Is Better.
If you believe in either of those philosophies, that last thing you
want to do is design a new language from the ground up when a suitable
library component is ready go. Rolling your own is comparable to
writing your own printf because you Ain't Gonna Need all of format
specifiers in the library version: it's a bastardization of the
philosophy, not adherence to it.
> Since when is language design the bottleneck for tool adoption?
Since when did I say it was? :)
Cheers,
Eric
- References:
- CMake and Lua, Ken Martin
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every
- Re: CMake and Lua, E. Wing
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every
- Re: CMake and Lua, Eric Tetz
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every
- Re: CMake and Lua, Eric Tetz
- Re: CMake and Lua, Jean-Claude Wippler
- Re: CMake and Lua, Eric Tetz
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every