[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: CMake and Lua
- From: "Brandon Van Every" <bvanevery@...>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 23:26:06 -0500
On Feb 12, 2008 11:06 PM, KHMan <keinhong@gmail.com> wrote:
> Brandon Van Every wrote:
> > On Feb 12, 2008 10:10 PM, KHMan <keinhong@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Brandon Van Every wrote:
> >>> [snip]
> > [snip snip]
> >> Perhaps if Brandon can get a sample CMake-to-Lua translator
> >> working (just a front end),
> >
> > I'm not volunteering for such a mission. I don't need CMake to "go
> > Lua."
>
> If you say
> you are only investigating this strategically, just treat my idea
> bubble as a burst bubble.
Of course if someone *can* demonstrate "better build paradigms" in
some tool somewhere, and Lua is a way to achieve that with CMake, and
particularly if someone can show me how it's worth $$$$$ to pursue,
then I'd get right on it. :-) But I'm not interested in writing a
CMake-to-Lua translator just as an experiment. I'm far more convinced
of $$$$$ in Autoconf + GMake --> CMake script translators.
Cheers,
Brandon Van Every
- References:
- CMake and Lua, Ken Martin
- Re: CMake and Lua, Wesley Smith
- Re: CMake and Lua, Olivier Delannoy
- Re: CMake and Lua, Thiago Bastos
- RE: CMake and Lua, Ken Martin
- Re: CMake and Lua, Thiago Bastos
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every
- Re: CMake and Lua, KHMan
- Re: CMake and Lua, Brandon Van Every
- Re: CMake and Lua, KHMan