Re: inline Lua?

[David Manura <dm.lua@...>]

David Given <dg <at> cowlark.com> writes:
>[...] What options did you compile the combined version with? Did you try 
> -finline-functions on it? Because I'm very surprised that you're not seeing 
> anything at all.
> (Apart from anything else, tweaking the Lua source so non-exported symbols 
> were defined static

I forgot to add that both were simply -O3, which includes -finline-functions. 
Converting everything in the combined version to static didn't seem to help--in
fact, it seemed a bit worse.  So, I'll believe it when I see it.  Maybe it's the
compiler or platform I'm using though.