[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
[Date Index]
[Thread Index]
- Subject: Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn
- From: Shmuel Zeigerman <shmuz@...>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:20:53 +0200
mnewberry wrote:
Ben,
For my part, I am not asking anyone to turn Lua into C/C++. I'm suggesting
small changes to syntax to make it more consistent with how we already
think. It is amazing how little nits like -- versus // or ~= versus != can
make something easy to use or an annoyance to use. If the vast majority of
people using Lua come from the C/C++ lineage then they're going to find the
current syntax a nuisance.
Michael
FWIW: I'm one that did "come from the C/C++ lineage", and found Lua
syntax to be very clear, intuitive and just nice. I've no wish
whatsoever to see it changed.
--
Shmuel
- References:
- Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Vijay Aswadhati
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Boyko Bantchev
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Chris Marrin
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Keith Wiles
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Alen Ladavac
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, mnewberry
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Tom Reahard
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Brian Weed
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Walter Cruz
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, Ben Sunshine-Hill
- Re: Scripting language takes a silicon turn, mnewberry