Re: Re[2]: package proposal

[Asko Kauppi <asko.kauppi@...>]

I wasn't planning to go this far on the route, yet.  Just to see, which 
implications the discussion on modules would have for distribution.

But, having said that, I agree with your list below.  Note: PocketPC 
should also be as #1.  Incidentially, this is also the way LuaX does.. 
;P   (well, 1 & 3 anyhow)

-ak

23.9.2004 kello 03:44, Adrián Pérez kirjoitti:

>  The only advantage of Windows binaries is that they are compatible 
> across a plethora of versions of the OS. So I think that the following 
> options could be possible:
>
>  1. If under Win32, grab a binary version of the module.
>  2. Under Unix, grab a binary version if available.
>  3. Under Unix, build from sources.
>
> (Note: I think of MacOS X as another Unix flavour).